Lifestyle

I fired an M1911 .45 cal pistol at a range while in the National Guard. At 15 yards I could barely hit a silouette due to the recoil. Is it really an effective sidearm?

You never fired an m1911 at a 15 yard target while in the national guard of any state in the United States. The first problem is its a m1911a1.

The third issue is you have the hand and arm strength to hold the weapon to begin with you will easily control its recoil with a single hand. I skipped the second issue on purpose assuming its a typo. Anyone who has served and qualified with any weapon will spot it in under 5 seconds.

Finally if you or your armorer were remotely competently trained, 50m targets are an easy shot. If both are weapon is very capable of hitting human size targets at 100 meters.

Colonel David Hackworth did a study on the effectiveness of the .45 M1911A1, other small arms and the small arms training standards of troops deployed to Vietnam. He found that the .45 was the cause of most casualties from accidental discharges.

This was probably due to many guns being issued at the mean end of service life, with safety mechanisms beginning to fail. This issue ,coupled with insufficient training given to draftees, and heavy recoil, made the weapon ineffective for all but eye to eye range. On the converse there is an account of an helicopter crew-member, who was into competition shooting with the .45.

When he was shot down in Vietnam, he managed to hold off at least a platoon of NVA killing many at pistol range with his personal .45(likely customized), until he was rescued. It is a fine weapon in trained hands. It’s not a Glock. It’s a classic from a different era.


I fired an M1911 .45 cal pistol at a range while in the National Guard. At 15 yards I could barely hit a silouette due to the recoil. Is it really an effective sidearm?

Pathetic, if not completely made up.

Recoil happens AFTER you fire the weapon, not before, so there should be no problem putting the sights on target due to recoil.

The reason you are missing the target is because you are not competent at shooting with pistols.

You mention recoil, so its likely you were flinching in anticipation of the recoil. This is a very common and easily correctable issue.

For someone who is skilled with the weapon, the .45 is quite effective.

Dont blame the weapon.

It hasn’t remained popular for over a century just because its pretty.

Related Posts

Is Karoline Leavitt more of a good or a bad person, objectively speaking?

Bad. She doesn’t have to work. She’s the pretty wife of one of Trump’s friends and Big Donors. Her husband is thirty years older and rich. She lies…

Why do liberals, when they lose a discussion because you show them proof, block you from responding?

To be honest, EVERY TIME a liberal is shown actual verifiable proof – you know, the kind grand juries use to indict people, relying on investigations and sworn…

Are farmers really angry or unhappy with President Trump?

I met an Iowa corn farmer on a cruise in 2016. Interesting guy, very smart, and very much a trump supporter. There were zero democrats where he lived,…

Do police cars have secretly powerful engines in the US?

Well, there was never anything “secret” about police car packages and options. What used to be known as “interceptor” engines stopped being offered by the beginning of the…

I’m a SENIOR. This country is going broke. How is it with you liberals that you cannot see this?

Dear Senior, Only three Presidents in the modern era reduced the deficit: Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. You worry about “going broke.” The first step in…

Do you think humans will still be around when the continents come back together in 250 million years?

Trust me. You don’t want to be on Earth in about 250 million years when the continents come back together and a new supercontinent forms. And do you know why?…

error: Content is protected !!